• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Nutt says Class A's should be decriminalised
#1
Prof. Nutt in the press again
Reply
#2
Nutt Wrote:"They should be decriminalised, there is no doubt about that. It is clear, if you are using a drug less dangerous than alcohol, that is a rational choice. If, like crack cocaine, it is more harmful of course, that is different. Addiction is also another matter but it requires treatment," he told reporters yesterday.

He added that he was not in favour of full legalisation and "selling heroin in supermarkets" but said a system whereby drugs - including Class A substances - were sold in pharmacies could work.

Professor Nutt said: "It is clear that the best way of preventing people from coming to harm is education. People need to know what they are doing. I do not see any reason why people should not access drugs like cannabis or MDMA through a pharmacy.

"At least then, you would know what you are getting. You could then deal with the issues under things like trade laws; that would give people a great deal of safety. When BZB was being made available in New Zealand, under this system, it was made by companies to a very high quality."

But he added that he would not advocate people being allowed to simply buy up stocks of the most harmful drugs, like heroin.

Professor Nutt was sacked by the government nearly three years ago after a turbulent relationship with two Home Secretaries: Jacqui Smith and Alan Johnson, who sacked him after comparing the dangers of drug use with the dangers of horse riding.

He argued he was simply trying to provide perspective on the perils and, as he left the unpaid post, accused ministers of undermining scientists.

Launching his book "Drugs - without the hot air" yesterday, he also claimed that the criminalisation of many drugs which may have medicinal benefits has dealt a greater blow to science than the opposition to stem cell research.

He claimed that difficulties with obtaining licenses and reliable samples of the most tightly controlled substances meant that potentially helpful drugs were not being researched.

"Before LSD was banned in 1965, there were lots of studies done, since then, there has been one," he said.

This man should seriously be listened to.
The government must simply not understand how much money they could pull in through taxing these products heavily, too... because that is all they care about... the money.
I'd be willing to buy any (currently) illegal drug from a pharmacy at a higher-than-street price, straightly for the fact that I would know how much there is and I would be assured of the purity.
https://drug.cafe Encrypted Messaging & Chat Rooms
https://forum.drug.cafe Forum
[Image: 3ANSKL2.png]

Need to e-mail me?
Reply
#3
..it would appear the proceeds from the illegal drugs trade is worth more to them & the shadow banking system than taxation.. additionally there's the revenue generated by the trade in prohibition..

..it's a war after all.. apparently..
Reply

Reddit   Facebook   Twitter  




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

   
DISCLAIMER
Any views or opinions posted by members are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UKCR staff team.